Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Pardon the Interruption: House 6:19 - The Choice

Overall: 6.3

I think the writers are starting to rediscover this show's emotional core. Took them long enough!

(Note: Appended to the review below are a few remarks on last week's episode. I just got around to watching it tonight, and as I came away with a different impression than did my co-author, I figured I'd pipe up with my own thoughts.)



Plot Synopsis:

The official recap can be found here.

Writing: 7.0

This script -- is actually not that bad. The plots don't fit together as seamlessly as I'd normally prefer, but individually, they make sense. In fact, for some characters, we appear to be swinging back onto the right track. At the very least, Taub seems to have recovered his senses thanks to House's reverse psychology (a tactic that appears to be favored by at least one other character, as I'll discuss below).

House's plot -- reminds me why, personally, I'll never be able to give this show up. There has definitely been some drift this year when it comes to writing a "recovering" House, but I think the show runners have finally struck pay dirt in allowing Wilson to enter another relationship (my thoughts on that relationship can also be found in the appended comments below). It was devastating enough for House when Cuddy decided to move on, but now that Wilson is making his own hesitant attempts to do the same, House has found himself in a very dangerous place. He genuinely wants his only two friends to be happy, but he also doesn't know what he's going to do if they are no longer 100% available 24/7. Thanks to some psychiatric intervention, he can now admit - openly - that he doesn't want to be alone, and he recognizes that the life he led "before" was tragically incomplete -- but he still doesn't know what to do with that new-found self-knowledge.

Anyone who has ever gone through a psychological recovery process will tell you that despair is inevitable; once you recognize that you have a problem and start attempting to move forward, you eventually hit that wall - that point when you realize exactly how far from your ultimate goals you really are. House is there. In this episode, we can see it in his eyes. We can see his recognition that he needs to reach out to his team, but we also see him struggling with a classic fear that has afflicted many a gifted kid - that fear that through a lifetime of developing one's talents and pursuing one's obsessions, you have rendered yourself completely unable to relate to the rest of humanity. I sort of know how that feels. And House has to deal with one more problem besides: up until the past few years, he has coped with his social anxiety by persuading himself that humanity as a whole is debased and broken and not worth his time. So not only does House fear his own inability to carry on an ordinary conversation, but he also has to fight against personal programming that has him convinced that other people can only hurt him in the end. That's a huge uphill battle - and House is fully aware of this fact.

I'm babbling. Suffice it to say that I grok what the writers are doing with House, and I think it's realistic psychologically. Granted, it took awhile to finally get here, but I think my trust in the writers where House the character is concerned has once again been vindicated.

Acting: 6.0

Unfortunately, I don't much care for the actor who plays the patient of the week and am similarly unimpressed with the actress who plays his fiance.

Message: 6.0

About the gay reprogramming issue: I agree with the show runners that such methods are abusive and ultimately futile. I think we're born with our sexual preferences, and no amount of shock therapy is going to change how we're wired. However -- I think it does homosexuals a disservice to adopt the politically correct notion that they have absolutely no control over their impulses - that, indeed, they will die inside if they don't satisfy said impulses - and I actually agree with the patient's insistence that we can choose how we express (or not express, as the case may be) our inclinations. I know of at least one person - a Catholic - who has consciously decided to stay faithful to the teachings of the Church despite her homosexuality, and I think she would certainly object to the idea that gays are rutting animals who can't help themselves - or that gays have to build their identity entirely around their sexuality.

And now for a bonus comment on last week's episode:

When I watched Open and Shut, I did not come away with the sense that the writers were supporting open marriage. Here's why:

First of all, when House makes his remark about the rarity of perfect monogamy in the animal kingdom (a debatable remark scientifically), the writers allow Taub to reply with the observation that animals also kill and eat their own young, thereby effectively laying waste to the naturalist fallacy.

Secondly, notice how the husband responds when one of his wife's on-the-side lovers decides to visit. "This is our family space!" he snarls. Hmm. If this open marriage were so wonderful and hunky dory, why would the husband be so insistent that their daughter not be exposed to her mother's infidelity? That to me reads as an implicit acknowledgment that open marriages are damaging to children.

Thirdly, House turns out to be right about the husband's "score card," which suggests that the patient's open marriage is not marked by sacrificial giving and love, but is instead marked by selfish game play.

Fourth, open marriage certainly doesn't work out for the Taubs.

Fifth, when House makes his remark about his patient's "sleeping with other dudes," his voice is dripping with contempt. At least here, House's romantic moralism seems to stay very much intact.

Sixth, when Taub tells the others that he didn't go through with the whole open marriage idea, Thirteen's response reads to me as mock disappointment, not genuine disappointment. And that suggests to me that Thirteen, like House, is rather fond of reverse psychology. "Tell him what he apparently wants to hear, and then let him discover for himself that he's an idiot," Thirteen seems to be thinking.

I do agree that allowing Taub to entertain the idea of having an open marriage is a poor choice - something done just for the shock value. But I think, based on the evidence above, that the writers come down on the right side of the issue overall.

On another matter altogether, it appears my suspicions regarding Wilson's first marriage were somewhat correct: the break up was in fact a two-way deal. In typical Wilson fashion, Wilson gave Sam everything she wanted regardless of his own needs and then sat on his growing feelings of resentment, gradually becoming more and more distant and cold. Sam then responded to Wilson's drift away from her by becoming angry and demanding. It's actually a pretty common pattern, and I don't think it's fair to conclude outright that Sam was a selfish bitch who drained Wilson dry. I think Wilson shares some responsibility for the failure of that marriage. (Which means that Sam's apparent insincerity might have been a case of poor acting rather than a deliberate choice. Either that, or writing pelican A is not talking to writing pelican B.)

4 comments:

  1. Why are you reading "mock" anger in thirteen's response to Taub? What context do you have to support that position? I didn't get anything approaching mock from Olivia Wilde's portrayal...only contempt for Taub's indecision. I am open to being proven wrong, but I don't know what you're seeing there.

    I read House's final slam at the patient not as moral outrage, but as bitter realist observation. He knows their arrangement doesn't work and hates it when people delude themselves. I don't think he has a moral beef with polygamy or open marriages. When he sees someone claiming they're happy when they clearly aren't...he calls them on it. It has nothing to do with moralism IMHO. Unless you believe BOTH House AND Thirteen think Taub will only straighten up and fly right through reverse psychology (which, I suppose, is possible)...then House's naturalist comment goes unchallenged by your rebuttal...Taub shot it down, but then later acted against his own argument. And House never retracts his scientifically inaccurate claim.

    I certainly think the HUSBAND didn't like their open marriage...I agree with your point #2. And yes, the open marriage didn't work for the Taubs...but Taub himself was apparently unaffected by this...at least as of last week.

    As for the Wilson plot...I agree with your psychological analysis that Wilson held onto his frustrations and ended up resenting her and becoming cold...but I don't agree that this makes it clear that the wife was NOT a selfish bitch. Wilson calls her a selfish bitch in the episode and she ADMITS TO BEING...a selfish bitch. It's a two-way street...it always is...but she is not innocent of House's charge.

    ReplyDelete
  2. BTW...feel free to do what I did and post your alternate rating in the index post (I did this for 5 to 9...you might as well do it here if your number is vastly different, which it sounds like it is).

    ReplyDelete
  3. > First of all ... animals also
    > kill and eat their own young,
    > thereby effectively laying waste
    > to the naturalist fallacy.

    It's a pity none of them mentioned humans closest relatives, the bonobos. I'm including two links. I can't tell from the preview where they will show up.
    http://www.blockbonobofoundation.org/
    http://songweaver.com/info/bonobos.html

    > Secondly ...If this open marriage
    > were so wonderful and hunky dory,
    > why would the husband be so insistent
    > that their daughter not be exposed
    > to her mother's infidelity?

    People in open marriages choose how much to tell to whom based on many factors, including how conservative their family and friends are and how much risk "coming out" will create for jobs, housing, and other quality of life matters. People in open marriages also choose different boundaries for interactions of partners with family members. These different choices are just like the different choices people make about working moms versus stay-at-home moms, or public school versus private school, or vegetarian versus meat-eaters. Just because it's different than you or I would choose doesn't make it automatically wrong.

    > Thirdly...the husband's "score card,"

    That's irrelevant. Open marriage has very little to do with how many partners a person has. It has everything to do how the marriage partners treat each other. The husband gave his wife what he believed she needed. Yes, they need to improve their communication skills. Big whoop. Name a marriage that couldn't use that.

    > Fourth, open marriage certainly
    > doesn't work out for the Taubs.

    Of course not. His wife agreed to something she didn't really want without trying to prepare. Just exactly like jumping into the deep end of the pool without learning to swim first. Newcomers to open marriage are routinely advised to SLOW DOWN. This is even more the case when only one partner wants it to be open. This situation calls for many, many, long, deep, conversations. The lesson from the Taubs could very well be, "Do your homework first."

    > Fifth, when House makes his remark
    > about his patient's "sleeping with
    > other dudes," his voice is dripping
    > with contempt.

    Duh. House's voice is ALWAYS dripping with contempt about everybody.

    > Sixth... Thirteen's response reads
    > to me as mock disappointment.

    People who have or try open marriage experience disrespect routinely from others around them who believe it's wrong. Why should Thirteen be any different? Art imitating life.

    > I do agree that allowing Taub to
    > entertain the idea of having an
    > open marriage is a poor choice -
    > something done just for the shock value.

    As someone IN an open marriage, I'm delighted to see the topic finding its way into TV programming. The complexity of its treatment in this House episode is especially welcome. Open marriage is neither all sweetness and roses nor all disaster and unhappiness. It's another way of being in relationship, with all the complexities, happiness, and challenges of any other relationship.

    > But I think, based on the evidence
    > above, that the writers come down on
    > the right side of the issue overall.

    From the vantage of 20 years of successful open marriage, I'll assert that the "right side" of the issue is choice in relationships. I make note of the final scene, in which Taub goes off with the woman who's caught his interest despite his wife Rachel's withdrawal of her agreement to open marriage. There's no choice in that decision for Rachel, no information, and no control over events that will affect her directly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Having just now finally gotten the chance to see the most recent episode...it now feels like House is indeed pullingstrings trying to actually help Taub see the light...not necessarily because he has a moral objection to cheating...but because his romantic rationalism makes him of the opinion that such a situation can't possibly work for Taub or his wife. I feel a little better now about how the writers are trying to use House's ascerbic wit. I'm *definitely* not convinced about your arguments re: thirteen, Steph. She still seems like a free-love supporter to me. But at least she's aware that it would be wrong to cheat and not give Taub's wife a choice in the matter. Progress is a good thing.

    And I definitely think House is heading for alcoholism (and the problem will get attention called to it by some medical disaster that makes him the patient of the week).

    ReplyDelete